![]() |
| HOME | SEARCH | CONTACT US | SITE MAP |
SUPPORT
This bond measure will allow the state to sell $13.05 billion of general obligation bonds to provide funding for a variety of projects to build, repair and modernize K-12 schools ($11.4billion) and higher education facilities ($1.65 billion). The bond measure will address the needs of rural and inner-city districts, large and small districts, suburban districts with surplus land and districts where open space is hard to find. Money will be provided for construction and improvements for low-scoring and critically overcrowded schools. Money is divided between 'backlog' projects, for which districts had previously submitted applications, and new projects. K-12 construction and improvement projects require local matching funds. This will be the first of two bond acts that attempt to adequately fund the projects needed by districts, saving districts from having to compete against each other for such funds. The Legislative Analyst estimates that the cost to repay principal and interest over 30 years would be about $26.2 billion, with an average payment of about $873 million per year. (See "Looking at Bond Measures".) This bond measure was placed on the ballot by the Legislature and signed by the Governor.
The state provides 50 percent of the money for new construction and 60 percent for approved modernization projects. California voters passed a school bond four years ago, but that money is depleted. In the past decade, voters have approved $11.5 billion in K-12 construction bonds, but only about $500 million of that remains for expenditure. Many districts have passed local school bonds and are waiting for matching funds from the state. They are ready to start construction and will be able to start building immediately. The building needs of the state were estimated in May 2002 to be for housing for 1.2 million pupils and modernization for an additional 1.2 million students, at an approximate cost of $20 billion. Proposition 47 provides $1.65 billion towards the estimated $4.4 billion in capital outlay projects planned by California's institutes of higher education for the period of 2003 through 2007.
The rebuttal to the opponents' argument was signed by Wayne Johnson, President, California Teachers Association; Bill Hauck, Co-Chair, Taxpayers for Accountability and Better Schools; and Barbara Inatsugu, President, League of Women Voters of California.
Kathy Webb, LWVC Social Policy Director, kwebblwv@aol.com Anne Henderson, LWVC Legislative Director, annehenderson@att.net Yes on 47 for Accountability and Better Schools, 111 Anza Blvd., Suite
406, Burlingame 94010. Phone: 650-340-0470 Barbara Inatsugu, LWVC President and member of the Yes on 47 Steering Committee, inatsugub@aol.com
Note: Please adapt this letter to your own community and check your local paper's word limit for published letters. Editor: When Californians go to the polls on November 5, we can invest in our future by supporting new schools and renovation of older ones. Proposition 47 will help to fix our schools and help our students succeed. California's public schools used to be among the best in the nation. A booming population and years of neglect and inadequate funding have changed that. We began improvements in the classroom with class size reduction several years ago, now we need to continue the improvements by building facilities to house these classes. Prop 47 will build new schools, repair leaky roofs, improve the energy efficiency of facilities, and upgrade our classrooms for access to technology, so that our students will be prepared for tomorrow's workforce. Funding will not come from increased taxes. This November's bond measure will provide $13.05 billion for our schools. California schools are beginning to "turn around." Let's help by improving the facilities. Vote YES on Proposition 47! Sincerely,
|
| |
|
|
|
|