TRANSPORTATION FUNDING: SALES AND USE TAX
REVENUES
Legislative Constitutional Amendment
THE QUESTION
Should the California Constitution be amended to require gasoline
and diesel fuel sales tax revenues be allocated for specified transportation
purposes, including highways, streets and roads, and transit improvements?
PROVISIONS
This measure places in the State Constitution those provisions
of current law that require that, from 2003-04 through 2007-08,
gasoline sales tax revenues be used for specified state and local
transportation purposes. The revenues would be allocated for transportation
purposes specified under the Transportation Congestion Relief Program
(TCRP).
In addition, the measure requires that starting in 2008-09, the
gasoline sales tax revenues continue to be used for state and local
transportation purposes. The revenues would be allocated as follows:
- 20 percent to public transportation.
- 40 percent to transportation improvement projects funded
in the State Transportation Improvement Program, a five-year transportation
capital investment program.
- 40 percent to local streets and roads improvements; with
half of the amount (20 percent) allocated to counties and
half to cities.
The measure authorizes the Legislature to modify this distribution
of the revenues with a two-thirds vote. The measure also provides
that the use of these revenues for transportation purposes can be
suspended under specified conditions.
BACKGROUND
California spends over $15 billion annually to maintain, operate,
and improve its highways, streets and roads, rail, and transit systems.
About half of these revenues come from the local level in the form
of local sales and property taxes and transit fares. The remainder
comes from the state and federal levels, largely as motor fuel (gasoline)
and diesel fuel taxes and truck weight fees.
Currently, the state levies two types of taxes on gasoline and
diesel fuel:
- An excise tax of 18 cents on each gallon of gasoline and diesel
fuel.
- A sales tax on the sales of gasoline and diesel fuel. The statewide
rate is 5.75 percent through 2001. This rate will change
to 6 percent on January 1, 2002.
Revenues from the state excise tax on gasoline and diesel fuel
used on public roads total about $3 billion a year. These revenues
are dedicated to transportation purposes.
Revenues from most of the state sales tax on diesel fuel--4.75 percent
out of the statewide rate--are also used for transportation. However,
most of the revenues from the state sales tax on gasoline have historically
been used for various general purposes, including education, health,
social services, corrections, and local government fiscal relief.
Only a small portion of the state gasoline sales tax revenues have
been used for transportation.
In 2000, the Transportation Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) was
enacted in California. Under the program, gasoline sales tax revenues
will be used from 2003-04 through 2007-08 for specified transportation
purposes including highways, streets and roads, and transit improvements.
Thereafter, these revenues will be available for various general
state purposes.
FISCAL EFFECT
The measure places in the State Constitution those provisions of
current law that require the use of state gasoline sales tax revenues
for state and local transportation purposes from 2003-04 through
2007-08. Consequently, for that period, the measure would have no
additional fiscal impact.
Beginning in 2008-09, the measure requires that state gasoline
sales tax revenues continue to be used for transportation purposes
in the future. The amount that would be used is projected to be
about $1.4 billion in 2008-09, increasing annually thereafter,
depending on increases in gasoline prices and consumption.
IMPACT OF YES OR NO VOTE
A YES vote means that provisions will be placed in the California
Constitution requiring all revenues from the sales tax on gasoline
and diesel fuels be used for transportation purposes only.
A NO votes means that the historic and current general uses of
revenues from the sales tax on gasoline and diesel fuels will remain.
SUPPORTERS SAY
- Proposition 42 ensures that the gasoline sales tax we're already
paying be spent to improve our highways, local streets and mass
transit, without increasing or imposing new taxes.
- Proposition 42 creates jobs and boosts our economy with the
creation of construction and engineering projects, generating
nearly six times the amount in economic benefits.
- Proposition 42 requires an annual audit to ensure projects are
delivered on time and on budget.
OPPONENTS SAY
Proposition 42 pits vital state programs against each other and
puts transportation funding ahead of priorities for education, health,
and safety concerns.
- Proposition 42 locks into the Constitution spending priorities through
2008.
- Since September 11th of last year, government has
greater demands on it to protect our public safety and health,
and needs flexible funding sources to do so.
SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION
Official ballot arguments in support are signed by Commissioner
Dwight Helmick, California Highway Patrol; Leo Soong, Chair of the
Board, California State Automobile Association-AAA; Lieutenant Ed
Gray, President, California Organization of Police and Sheriffs
(COPS).
Official ballot arguments in opposition are signed by Wayne
Johnson, President, California Teachers Association; Howard Owens,
President, Congress of California Seniors Education and Resource
Foundation; William D. Powers, President, Health Access of California.
For more information:
Supporters:
- Taxpayers for Traffic Relief/Yes on 42, A Coalition of Taxpayers,
Construction, Business, Labor, Engineers and Commuters, (310)
996-2671, www.yesprop42.com
- California State Office of Emergency Services, (916) 262-1816
- California Taxpayers Association, Marian Bergeson, Former Member,
California State Board of Education
Opponents:
- California Teachers Association, (650) 697-1400, www.cta.org
- Lenny Goldberg, Director, California Tax Reform Association,
(916) 446-4300
- Viola Gonzales, Executive Director, Latino Issues Forum
- Jeff Sedivec President, California State Firefighters' Association
For more information, see Smart
Voter Proposition 42.
You may link to any individual proposition page.
You may print and circulate this copyrighted material if you use it
in its entirety (the introductory
page plus the six proposition pages) and give credit to
the League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.
Send
comments and suggestions concerning the content of this page to
lwvcprocon@hotmail.com.
Send comments concerning the format or usability of this page to
lwvc@vcwatts.org
|